Category Archives: Uncategorized

Bauhaus

1442257516208.jpg
Bauhaus Curriculum Wheel. Walter Gropius. 1922.

“To the Bauhaus, design was an applied form of art, an approach that I believe to be fundamentally wrong. It is what creates a misleading impression that designers make beautiful objects. Design is a way of thinking, about addressing the fundamental needs of people and society. It can be applied to all aspects of human and societal life. Some things that we design do not have a physical structure: art, materials, form have little or no relevance. When the things that we design are tangible or visible, then yes, form matters. However, even here, I would place form second to utility: designers make things for people to use. They must be understandable, usable, emotionally delightful. For me, appearance Is extremely important, but secondary to utility. The great designers know how to make delightful, beautiful objects that are also functional, understandable, usable. That is what 21st century design should be. That is what it must be in this age of ever-more complex technology that, without the aid of designers, would be unintelligible, frustrating and a danger to society.”
~ Don Norman

Qualia

inverted qualia.jpeg
made by Was a bee.

“The inverted spectrum thought experiment, originally developed by John Locke,[8] invites us to imagine that we wake up one morning and find that for some unknown reason all the colors in the world have been inverted. Furthermore, we discover that no physical changes have occurred in our brains or bodies that would explain this phenomenon. Supporters of the existence of qualia argue that since we can imagine this happening without contradiction, it follows that we are imagining a change in a property that determines the way things look to us, but that has no physical basis.” (wiki)
More on the inverted spectrum argument here.

Nobody

skinny-mint-chocolate-parfait-2
Image via The Cookie Rookie

It began with the The New Yorker’s article on Oxford philosopher Derek Parfit (which in my head I keep pronouncing as “parfait” and I’m not sure if that’s because I’ve been denying myself ice cream or because of the piece I recently read on an Italian cardiologist’s patented performance-enhancing gelato). In any case, somehow I ended up down another fascinating road…baha!…the non-identity problem!

This is so interesting and sort of comical in how the language used to articulate the problem loops around. Honestly, I giggle as I type.

The non-identity problem, defined by Stanford’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “focuses on the obligations we think we have in respect of people who, by our own acts, are caused both to exist and to have existences that are, though worth having, unavoidably flawed – existences, that is, that are flawed if those people are ever to have them at all.”

Bahaha!!!!

Wiki’s definition of our obligations to “nobody” is a little easier to grasp:

“Study of weather patterns and other physical phenomena in the 20th century has shown that very minor changes in conditions at time T have drastic effects at all times after T. Compare this to the romantic involvement of future childbearing partners. Any actions taken today, at time T, will affect who exists after only a few generations. For instance, a significant change in global environmental policy would shift the conditions of the conception process so much that after 300 years none of the same people that would have been born are in fact born. Different couples meet each other and conceive at different times, and so different people come into existence. This is known as the ‘non-identity problem’.

We could thus craft disastrous policies that would be worse for nobody, because none of the same people would exist under the different policies. If we consider the moral ramifications of potential policies in person-affecting terms, we will have no reason to prefer a sound policy over an unsound one provided that its effects are not felt for a few generations. This is the non-identity problem in its purest form: the identity of future generations is causally dependent, in a very sensitive way, on the actions of the present generations.”

And boom! That’s the kicker right there. We need to consider our thoughts and actions as potential contributions to future generations. Everything is temporary and yet parts are permanent because it’s reinterpreted and carried forth by someone, like myself, who catches it in midair. And because I have grasped it, am changed forever. Be careful what you think…”as thinking makes it so” (Shakespeare) .

And I’m thinking about making one of these! Cookie Rookie’s Skinny Mint Parfait… 😛